GUARD SAGAS

OpenSSLに制限のないリソース割り当ての脆弱性(CVE-2026-75804)

公開日 更新日 危険度:中

概要

OpenSSLに制限のないリソース割り当ての脆弱性が確認されました。

バージョン 3.4.0 以上 3.4.8 未満、3.5.0 以上 3.5.9 未満、3.6.0 以上 3.6.5 未満、4.0.0 以上 4.0.3 未満に影響があります。

修正版 3.4.8 / 3.5.9 / 3.6.5 / 4.0.3 への更新が推奨されます。

脆弱性の基本情報

脆弱性ID CVE-2026-75804
脆弱性の種類制限のないリソース割り当て (CWE-770)
危険度中
CVSSスコア 5.3(CVSS v3.1) 評価元:NVD(National Vulnerability Database / NIST)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
公開日2026年9月29日
更新日2026年10月8日

影響を受ける製品

製品影響を受けるバージョン修正版出典
OpenSSL
その他
3.4.0 以上 3.4.8 未満、3.5.0 以上 3.5.9 未満、3.6.0 以上 3.6.5 未満、4.0.0 以上 4.0.3 未満 3.4.8 / 3.5.9 / 3.6.5 / 4.0.3 NVD(National Vulnerability Database / NIST)

推奨対応

  • OpenSSLを、ご利用中の系列に対応する修正版(3.4.8 / 3.5.9 / 3.6.5 / 4.0.3)またはそれ以降の公式最新版へ更新してください。
  • OpenSSLを OS・ディストリビューションのパッケージで利用している場合は、提供元の公式セキュリティ更新が適用されているかを確認してください(独自に修正が取り込まれている場合があります)。

情報元の原文

NVD(National Vulnerability Database / NIST) CVE-2026-75804
Issue summary: OpenSSL QUIC stack does not enforce connection level flow control for streams. Remote peers may send more bytes as long as they fit within the stream flow control limits. Impact summary: A malicious remote peer may exploit the lack of connection flow control for streams to make the QUIC stack receive ~100MB of memory instead of 768 KiB (default flow control window size). CWE: CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling Description: The local QUIC stack advertises two flow control limits to its remote peer: stream flow control limit and connection flow control limit. The remote peer must follow both limits when transmitting stream data. Whenever the local QUIC stack receives a stream frame, it validates that the size of the received stream frame stays within flow control limits. If either limit is exceeded (stream level or connection level), then the QUIC stack must close the connection with a flow control error. The vulnerable OpenSSL QUIC stack enforces the stream-level but not the connection-level limit. To exploit the issue, three conditions must be met: - the remote peer opens several streams - each stream must stay within the stream-level flow control limit - there must be no zero-offset byte sent on any of the streams (to prevent the vulnerable QUIC stack from consuming data). By meeting the conditions above, the remote peer may make the local stack allocate 2 x MAX_STREAMS x (stream flow control limit) bytes of memory. MAX_STREAMS defaults to 100, and the limit applies to both bidirectional and unidirectional streams, making it 200 in total. The default flow control window for a stream is 512kB. The remote peer may force the vulnerable QUIC stack to allocate 100MB of heap per connection. FIPS impact: no The FIPS module is not affected as the QUIC implementation is outside of the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
利用条件:米国政府の著作物(パブリックドメイン)・原文のまま掲載
Copyright 1999-2026 The MITRE Corporation
CVE Usage: MITRE hereby grants you a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable copyright license to reproduce, prepare derivative works of, publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE®). Any copy you make for such purposes is authorized provided that you reproduce MITRE's copyright designation and this license in any such copy.
CVE List(CVE Program) CVE-2026-75804

QUIC Connection-Level Flow Control is Not Enforced for Streams

Issue summary: OpenSSL QUIC stack does not enforce connection level flow control for streams. Remote peers may send more bytes as long as they fit within the stream flow control limits. Impact summary: A malicious remote peer may exploit the lack of connection flow control for streams to make the QUIC stack receive ~100MB of memory instead of 768 KiB (default flow control window size). CWE: CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling Description: The local QUIC stack advertises two flow control limits to its remote peer: stream flow control limit and connection flow control limit. The remote peer must follow both limits when transmitting stream data. Whenever the local QUIC stack receives a stream frame, it validates that the size of the received stream frame stays within flow control limits. If either limit is exceeded (stream level or connection level), then the QUIC stack must close the connection with a flow control error. The vulnerable OpenSSL QUIC stack enforces the stream-level but not the connection-level limit. To exploit the issue, three conditions must be met: - the remote peer opens several streams - each stream must stay within the stream-level flow control limit - there must be no zero-offset byte sent on any of the streams (to prevent the vulnerable QUIC stack from consuming data). By meeting the conditions above, the remote peer may make the local stack allocate 2 x MAX_STREAMS x (stream flow control limit) bytes of memory. MAX_STREAMS defaults to 100, and the limit applies to both bidirectional and unidirectional streams, making it 200 in total. The default flow control window for a stream is 512kB. The remote peer may force the vulnerable QUIC stack to allocate 100MB of heap per connection. FIPS impact: no The FIPS module is not affected as the QUIC implementation is outside of the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
利用条件:CVE の利用条件(CVE Terms of Use)・原文のまま掲載
Copyright 1999-2026 The MITRE Corporation
CVE Usage: MITRE hereby grants you a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable copyright license to reproduce, prepare derivative works of, publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE®). Any copy you make for such purposes is authorized provided that you reproduce MITRE's copyright designation and this license in any such copy.

情報元

This product uses data from the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.

(本サイトは NVD API のデータを利用していますが、NVD による推奨・認定を受けたものではありません。)

このページは各情報源から定期取得した情報を自動で掲載しています。日本語の表示は取得済みのデータ(製品・影響バージョン・修正版・CVSS 等)から定型文で作成しており、AIによる生成・翻訳は行っていません。取得できていない情報は表示していません。最新の情報は情報元でご確認ください。

あなたのサイトは大丈夫ですか?

GUARD SAGAS の無料診断で、CMS・サーバーのバージョンや既知の脆弱性への該当状況を確認できます。

無料診断をはじめる

← 脆弱性情報の一覧へ